TickerTape
Weekly Global Stablecoin & CBDC Update
South Korea’s Financial Services Commission is drafting “corporate virtual currency trading” guidelines that would allow listed companies to invest in digital assets while explicitly excluding major dollar-pegged stablecoins such as Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC. Regulators intend to cap eligible firms’ crypto exposure at up to 5 percent of capital and restrict holdings to top assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum traded only through regulated exchanges such as Upbit and Bithumb. The exclusion of USD stablecoins is tied to the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act, which does not currently recognize stablecoins as a legitimate means of external payment, and to a policy push for Korean won-denominated stablecoins to reduce reliance on U.S. dollar tokens. The move comes as Asia accounts for about 60 percent of global stablecoin activity, or roughly 245 billion dollars of flows in 2025.
Key Takeaways:
- Financial Services Commission – plans corporate crypto rules that omit USDT and USDC from the list of permitted assets for listed firms.
- Corporate allocation cap – proposed guidelines limit eligible companies to investing up to 5 percent of their capital in crypto, focused on top assets like BTC and ETH.
- Legal framework – current Foreign Exchange Transactions Act does not classify stablecoins as approved external payment instruments, creating regulatory conflict.
- Market structure – stablecoins have grown to more than 300 billion dollars in value, with USDT and USDC controlling over 90 percent market share.
- Regional activity – Asia accounted for about 60 percent of stablecoin activity in 2025, totaling approximately 245 billion dollars, led by hubs such as Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan.
Why It Matters:
- Regulatory signaling – shows major economies may welcome corporate crypto exposure while still curbing direct reliance on foreign currency stablecoins.
- Sovereignty focus – highlights how monetary authorities are treating USD-pegged stablecoins as a national security and currency-sovereignty issue rather than a neutral payment tool.
- Adoption trajectory – suggests that institutional crypto adoption in South Korea will likely concentrate on Bitcoin and Ethereum rather than stablecoin balances on corporate balance sheets.
- Infrastructure evolution – indicates that future corporate payment and treasury systems in the region may favor local-currency stablecoins and regulated exchanges over offshore dollar tokens.
- Global stablecoin landscape – reinforces a broader trend in which jurisdictions seek to channel stablecoin growth into domestically anchored instruments instead of U.S. dollar dominance.
New data from RootData, citing Allium analytics, shows that aggregate stablecoin transfer volume reached 1.8 trillion dollars in February, the highest monthly level on record. USD Coin led activity with approximately 1.26 trillion dollars in transfers, representing about 70 percent of total stablecoin volume and outpacing Tether’s 514 billion dollars despite having less than half of USDT’s market capitalization. USDC’s supply stands near 77.4 billion dollars, compared with roughly 184 billion dollars for USDT, yet USDC has consistently processed higher transfer volumes in recent months. The figures underscore a shift in on-chain usage patterns toward regulated, fully reserved dollar tokens used for settlements, remittances, and trading liquidity, even as the overall stablecoin sector continues to expand.
Key Takeaways:
- Stablecoin market – recorded an all-time high of 1.8 trillion dollars in transfer volume in February according to Allium data.
- USDC flows – reached about 1.26 trillion dollars in transfers, capturing roughly 70 percent of total stablecoin volume.
- USDT flows – totaled around 514 billion dollars in the same period, significantly below USDC despite a larger outstanding supply.
- Market capitalization – USDC’s value is about 77.4 billion dollars versus approximately 184 billion dollars for USDT, yet USDC has led volumes for several consecutive months.
- Sector scale – global stablecoin capitalization is around 300 billion dollars, with tokens facilitating transactions worth trillions annually.
Why It Matters:
- Usage patterns – indicate that market participants are prioritizing perceived regulatory clarity and reserve transparency over sheer market cap when selecting settlement assets.
- Adoption trend – shows stablecoins increasingly being used as high-velocity transaction media rather than static store-of-value instruments.
- Market structure – suggests a gradual rebalancing of influence among major stablecoin issuers, with USDC gaining share in actual economic settlement flows.
- Financial plumbing – reinforces the role of stablecoins as a core component of crypto trading, cross-border transfers, and on-chain treasury operations.
- Long-term impact – supports expectations that regulated dollar-pegged tokens will remain central to global liquidity and could further integrate with traditional debt markets via Treasury-backed reserves.
An analysis from Tekedia highlights Solana’s rapid ascent as a leading blockchain for real-world payments and stablecoin-based settlements, driven by high throughput, sub-second finality, and transaction fees around 0.0004 dollars. According to a recent “State of Solana: Payments” report, Solana’s total payment volume grew 755.3 percent year over year in 2025, far outpacing traditional fintechs and other layer-1 networks. Stablecoin transactions on Solana reached roughly 650 billion dollars in February 2026, giving the network about 46 percent of stablecoin transfer market share among major chains. The article notes integrations with Visa, Stripe, Worldpay, PayPal’s PYUSD, Western Union’s USDPT, and Fiserv’s FIUSD, alongside daily non-vote transaction counts frequently above 100 to 150 million and weekly network fee revenue often exceeding 5 million dollars. Solana is increasingly described as a payment settlement layer for global finance.
Key Takeaways:
- Solana network – achieved approximately 755.3 percent year-over-year growth in total payment volume during 2025, according to Messari’s payments report.
- Stablecoin activity – processed about 650 billion dollars in stablecoin transactions in February 2026, representing roughly 46 percent of major-chain stablecoin transfer share.
- Transaction metrics – regularly handles 100 to 150 million non-vote transactions per day with fees near 0.0004 dollars per transaction.
- Institutional integrations – supports payment and settlement pilots or products with Visa, Stripe, Worldpay, PayPal’s PYUSD, Western Union’s USDPT, and Fiserv’s FIUSD.
- Ecosystem tools – features initiatives like payments.org and integrations with platforms such as Shopify merchants using Solana Pay, Revolut, Cash App, neobanks, and multiple wallet providers.
Why It Matters:
- Industry validation – demonstrates that high-throughput public blockchains are moving beyond speculation into large-scale payment and remittance use cases.
- Adoption signal – suggests that stablecoins and tokenized dollars on fast chains are becoming viable alternatives to card networks and traditional correspondent banking for certain corridors.
- TradFi convergence – shows major financial institutions testing blockchain rails for settlement efficiency, fee reduction, and treasury optimization.
- Infrastructure evolution – positions Solana as part of emerging “internet capital markets” infrastructure where value transfer, lending, and tokenized assets share a common settlement layer.
- Strategic trajectory – indicates that competitive advantage in digital payments may hinge on combining regulatory-compliant stablecoins with performant public networks rather than closed, proprietary systems.
The Reserve Bank of India is observing its annual Digital Payment Awareness Week under the national “Har Payment Digital” mission, focusing this year on safe and secure use of digital payment tools. The campaign, running from March 9 to 15, carries the theme “Safe Digital Payments” and emphasizes the message “Thoda Dhyan Se!” to highlight vigilance in everyday transactions. RBI guidance reiterates that users do not need to scan QR codes or enter PINs to receive payments, addressing common vectors for fraud in UPI and wallet ecosystems. In Kanpur and other districts, banks and financial institutions will conduct outreach programs, workshops, and public events at branches, markets, educational institutions, and public spaces to educate citizens on protecting OTPs, PINs, and passwords and verifying payee details before authorizing transfers. The initiative complements India’s broader push to deepen digital payment adoption while reducing fraud risks.
Key Takeaways:
- Reserve Bank of India – is running Digital Payment Awareness Week under the Har Payment Digital mission with a focus on safe usage.
- Campaign theme – centers on “Safe Digital Payments” with the tagline “Thoda Dhyan Se!” encouraging caution in digital transactions.
- User guidance – stresses that recipients do not need to scan QR codes or enter PINs to receive money and urges people never to share OTPs or passwords.
- Outreach activities – include awareness sessions at bank branches, markets, educational institutions, and public venues led by banks and financial institutions.
- Fraud prevention focus – highlights common scam vectors such as fake offers, lottery schemes, and phishing attempts in India’s fast-growing digital payments ecosystem.
Why It Matters:
- Consumer protection – underlines that scaling digital payments requires parallel investments in user education and fraud mitigation.
- Adoption quality – shows regulators prioritizing safe and informed usage so that rapid transaction growth does not translate into rising financial crime.
- Institutional response – reflects how central banks are pairing instant payment systems with behavioral campaigns to sustain trust in digital channels.
- Infrastructure linkage – connects India’s advanced retail payment rails, such as UPI and QR-based systems, with on-the-ground awareness efforts in smaller cities and districts.
- Long-term implication – supports a model where digital public infrastructure is complemented by continuous education, potentially serving as a template for other emerging markets.
India’s Ministry of Finance has notified the Income Tax (Amendment) Rules 2026, updating Rules 114F, 114G and 114H to explicitly bring central bank digital currencies, specified electronic money products and relevant crypto-assets into the country’s cross-border tax information reporting regime. Effective 1 January 2026, the rules broaden “depository account” and “depository institution” to cover entities holding CBDCs and specified e-money, introduce a 10,000 US dollar threshold for e-money depository accounts, and redefine “financial asset” to include interests in relevant crypto-assets. New definitions for CBDC, specified electronic money product and relevant crypto-asset align domestic law with OECD Common Reporting Standard and Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework concepts. Reporting institutions must now capture self-certification status, joint-account details, controlling-person roles, tax identification numbers, dates of birth and gross proceeds, with coordination to avoid double reporting where CARF data already exists.
Key Takeaways:
- Income Tax (Amendment) Rules 2026 update Rules 114F, 114G and 114H to explicitly cover CBDCs, specified e-money products and crypto-assets.
- Rule 114F introduces formal definitions of central bank digital currency, relevant crypto-asset and specified electronic money product.
- A 10,000 US dollar threshold is set for depository accounts representing specified electronic money products held for customers.
- “Financial asset” now includes interests and derivatives linked to relevant crypto-assets, and “depository institution” includes entities holding CBDCs or e-money.
- Reporting institutions must collect self-certifications, TINs, dates of birth, controlling-person roles and gross proceeds, coordinated with OECD CARF to prevent duplicate reporting.
Why It Matters:
- The amendments demonstrate that CBDCs and regulated e-money are being integrated into mainstream tax transparency regimes rather than treated as separate experimental instruments.
- Bringing crypto-asset interests and stable-value e-money into the same reporting perimeter signals that digital assets are moving from niche speculation into monitored financial infrastructure.
- The changes show how traditional tax authorities are adapting due diligence and reporting rules to keep pace with tokenized money, wallets and new intermediaries.
- Alignment with CRS and CARF terminology strengthens interoperability between India’s reporting systems and global information exchange on digital assets.
- By tightening definitions, thresholds and data fields, the rules lay groundwork for supervising large-scale CBDC and crypto use without leaving gaps in cross-border tax compliance.
Florida’s Senate unanimously passed Bill 314, the first state-level framework in the United States dedicated specifically to regulating payment stablecoins, and sent it to Governor Ron DeSantis for signature. The bill borrows heavily from the federal GENIUS Act, clarifying that qualifying payment stablecoins are not treated as securities, while classifying their issuers as Money Services Businesses subject to state licensing. Issuers must obtain MSB-style approvals, conduct full KYC checks, maintain real-time transaction records, report transfers above 10,000 dollars to the Office of Financial Regulation, and hold fully backed 1:1 reserves. Once an issuer’s total valuation reaches 10 billion dollars, oversight transitions toward federal supervision, creating a bridge between state and national regimes. The law also restricts yield-bearing stablecoin products by prohibiting interest payments when barred under federal law, and its passage comes as global stablecoin market capitalization has grown from about 205 billion dollars to 312.85 billion dollars since early 2025.
Key Takeaways:
- Florida Senate unanimously passed Bill 314 establishing a dedicated state framework for payment stablecoins.
- Bill 314 classifies payment stablecoins as monetary value, not securities, and treats issuers as Money Services Businesses.
- Issuers must obtain state MSB licenses, perform KYC, keep real-time records, and report transactions above 10,000 dollars.
- Issuers are required to maintain fully backed 1:1 reserves and move into federal oversight once valuation exceeds 10 billion dollars.
- Global stablecoin market capitalization is cited at approximately 312.85 billion dollars, up from 205 billion dollars in January 2025.
Why It Matters:
- Florida’s bill provides one of the clearest state-level blueprints yet for treating payment stablecoins as regulated money rather than unclassified crypto assets.
- The licensing, reserve, and reporting requirements reflect how rapidly stablecoins are maturing into systemically relevant payment and settlement infrastructure.
- The framework shows how state regulators are responding to bank concerns over yields and deposit flight by directly linking yield restrictions to federal law.
- Coordinated thresholds for federal oversight at 10 billion dollars in valuation illustrate how state rules are being designed to dovetail with national stablecoin statutes like the GENIUS Act.
- As other US states and jurisdictions watch Florida’s approach, this law could become a template for harmonized, multi-level regulation of dollar-pegged digital money.
Russia’s Ministry of Finance has accelerated work on a standalone stablecoin bill that officials say has “immense potential” for the domestic economy, aiming to move it on a separate track from a broader crypto trading law expected to reach the State Duma in the spring session and potentially take effect by July 1, 2026. The ministry plans to classify stablecoins as a distinct form of digital currency that can underpin a “fortified” settlement layer for trade, aligned with the Bank of Russia’s digital ruble initiative. Chainalysis data cited by officials indicates that ruble‑linked stablecoins such as A7A5 facilitated more than 93 billion dollars in transactions in one year, already operating at “industrial scale” for cross border settlements under sanctions. The central bank is also proposing that commercial banks become licensed crypto intermediaries, initially capped at exposures of 1 percent of capital.
Key Takeaways:
- The Russian Ministry of Finance is drafting a dedicated stablecoin bill separate from broader crypto trading rules.
- Legislative sequence targets passage of a general crypto law by July 1, 2026, followed by stablecoin specific rules.
- Chainalysis data shows ruble pegged stablecoins such as A7A5 processed over 93 billion dollars of transactions in one year.
- The Central Bank of Russia plan allows banks and brokers to act as crypto intermediaries with exposure capped at 1 percent of capital.
- Stablecoins are to be positioned as a core settlement tool that complements, rather than replaces, the digital ruble.
Why It Matters:
- Russian policy validates stablecoins as strategic payment infrastructure rather than purely speculative crypto assets.
- The growth of ruble pegged stablecoins signals rising demand for programmatic, cross border digital money under sanctions pressure.
- Traditional banks are being pulled directly into regulated crypto intermediation, blurring lines between legacy finance and digital assets.
- A dedicated legal category for stablecoins will more tightly connect them to Russia’s digital ruble and domestic clearing systems.
- A sanctions resilient stablecoin framework could accelerate the use of non dollar rails in international trade over the medium term.
The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has published a comprehensive notice of proposed rulemaking to implement the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act for entities under its jurisdiction, marking the first full prudential rule set for payment stablecoin issuers. Issued on February 25, the proposal covers licensing, permitted activities, reserve composition, capital and “operational backstop” standards, redemption timelines, custody rules and application procedures for permitted payment stablecoin issuers, including banks, federal qualified issuers, state qualified issuers and foreign issuers supervised by the OCC. Covered issuers must maintain fully segregated reserves whose fair value always equals or exceeds outstanding stablecoins, in tightly defined high quality liquid assets, and redeem tokens within two business days under normal conditions. The rule also operationalizes the statutory ban on paying “any form of interest or yield,” including via affiliates or third parties, and sets a minimum capital floor of 5 million dollars plus a liquidity backstop equal to 12 months of expenses.
Key Takeaways:
- The OCC proposal implements the GENIUS Act for payment stablecoins with a new Part 15 to 12 CFR and related capital rule changes.
- Covered issuers must keep one to one reserve backing in cash, Fed balances, insured deposits, short dated Treasuries and similar instruments, with a 20 day cap on reserve portfolio weighted average maturity.
- Redemption must generally be completed within two business days, with automatic extension up to seven calendar days if more than 10 percent of outstanding tokens are presented within 24 hours.
- Proposal enforces a prohibition on paying interest or yield on stablecoin holdings, including through presumed “backdoor” affiliate or white label arrangements.
- De novo issuers face a minimum capital requirement of at least 5 million dollars and must also hold an operational backstop equal to 12 months of total expenses in liquid assets.
Why It Matters:
- The rulemaking confirms that large U.S. payment stablecoin issuers will be supervised under a bank style prudential framework rather than light touch fintech rules.
- Strict reserve, liquidity and redemption provisions signal that regulators intend stablecoins to function as cash equivalent payment instruments, not speculative tokens.
- The explicit yield ban clarifies the long running policy dispute over whether dollar stablecoins can compete with bank deposits on interest.
- Detailed custody, application and foreign issuer provisions show how stablecoins will be integrated into existing supervisory and cross border oversight channels.
- The GENIUS Act’s fast timetable, with effectiveness tied to final rules or January 2027, means issuers must adjust balance sheet, product and distribution strategies on an accelerated schedule.
A new client alert from accounting firm Sisterson reports that recent IRS guidance confirms a phased move away from paper checks for refunds and mailed checks or money orders for payments, as part of a government wide modernization initiative to improve security and reduce fraud. The IRS has already cut back significantly on paper refund checks starting in late 2025 and is increasingly steering taxpayers toward electronic refunds, primarily via direct deposit, with prepaid debit cards as an option for those without traditional bank accounts. Paper refunds will still be processed, but missing bank details may trigger delays and requests for updated information delivered only by mail. On the payments side, the IRS is promoting Direct Pay, IRS Online Account, card payments and digital wallets, while legacy systems such as EFTPS are being phased out for individuals, though businesses and certain trusts are urged to maintain electronic capabilities for deposits and estimated taxes.
Key Takeaways:
- IRS guidance confirms a continued reduction in paper refund checks, building on a late 2025 cutback.
- Electronic refunds are expected to be the default, primarily via direct deposit, with debit cards as an alternative for unbanked taxpayers.
- Taxpayers who do not provide bank details may see refund delays while the IRS requests updated information exclusively through mailed correspondence.
- Recommended electronic payment options include IRS Direct Pay, the IRS Online Account, debit and credit cards, and digital wallets, while EFTPS use by individuals is being phased down.
- Businesses are advised to plan for fully electronic federal tax deposits and bulk or payroll related payments, with irrevocable trusts encouraged to maintain EFTPS access for quarterly estimates.
Why It Matters:
- The shift validates digital payment channels as the primary conduit for U.S. federal tax refunds and obligations.
- Growing reliance on direct deposit and online tools illustrates how government led initiatives can accelerate mainstream adoption of digital payments.
- Businesses and tax professionals must adjust workflows, controls and client support to align with a reduced role for mailed checks and money orders.
- The transition links taxpayer interactions more tightly to online identity, banking rails and digital wallets, reinforcing connections between public systems and private payment infrastructure.
- Over time, diminished support for paper processing may free resources for further automation and could set expectations for similar digitization across other government benefit and payment programs.
Digital Transactions reports a cluster of regulatory and product milestones in crypto and digital payments, led by Alchemy Pay’s receipt of a money transmitter license in Delaware, bringing its total to 15 U.S. states for its crypto payment gateway operations. Strike, which offers bitcoin and Lightning Network based services, has secured both a New York BitLicense and a money transmitter license, enabling fully regulated crypto payment services in one of the most tightly supervised U.S. markets. The brief also notes that payments firm PPRO is working with PayPal to let Swedish consumers using mobile app Swish, which has 8.7 million users, pay with a domestic method when shopping internationally, while Finastra has launched an AI based OperatorAssist tool to help banks automate payment exception handling. Additional items include Ordr’s adoption of Cy4Data Labs data protection and Cinnaholic’s return to Block’s Square point of sale platform.
Key Takeaways:
- Alchemy Pay now holds a money transmitter license in Delaware, its fifteenth U.S. state approval.
- Strike has obtained both a New York BitLicense and a money transmitter license, expanding regulated bitcoin and Lightning services in that jurisdiction.
- PPRO and PayPal are enabling Swish’s 8.7 million users in Sweden to use a local payment method for cross-border e-commerce purchases.
- Finastra has introduced an AI powered OperatorAssist module to automate payment exception handling for banks using its payment hub.
- Ordr has implemented Cy4Data Labs data protection, and Cinnaholic has returned to Block’s Square point of sale system after a year with another provider.
Why It Matters:
- Additional state licenses for Alchemy Pay and a New York BitLicense for Strike indicate ongoing regulatory normalization of crypto payment gateways within U.S. money transmitter regimes.
- The expansion of Swish based cross border payments through PayPal and PPRO shows how domestic real time payment schemes are being bridged into global e-commerce.
- AI driven tools like Finastra’s OperatorAssist highlight how banks are upgrading payment operations to handle higher digital volumes with fewer manual interventions.
- Partnerships that let consumers pay in familiar local methods while merchants receive funds through global platforms deepen the integration of digital wallets with card networks and acquirer infrastructure.
- The combination of licensing wins and technology rollouts underscores how digital asset and traditional payment providers are converging toward a unified, regulated digital payments stack.
A coalition of US House Republicans led by Representative Michael Cloud sent a letter to congressional leadership demanding that the temporary CBDC moratorium in the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act be replaced with a permanent ban on a US central bank digital currency. The lawmakers argue that any CBDC would enable unconstitutional financial surveillance and give unelected officials excessive control over Americans’ money. They threaten to treat the Senate’s housing bill as “dead on arrival” in the House unless the CBDC language is toughened to match an earlier House‑passed permanent ban. The article notes that the pushback comes as the Senate moves a version that only pauses the Fed’s CBDC authority, while global CBDC projects like China’s e‑CNY and Europe’s digital euro continue to advance, highlighting a growing divergence between US and foreign approaches.
Key takeaways:
- House Republicans are demanding a permanent prohibition on a US CBDC, not just a time‑limited moratorium.
- The letter targets the CBDC provision in the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act and threatens to block the bill.
- Lawmakers frame CBDCs as tools of financial surveillance and government overreach.
- The campaign references Trump’s promises to keep the US ahead in crypto while rejecting CBDCs.
- The article contrasts US resistance with accelerating CBDC work in China and Europe.
Why it matters:
- Escalates CBDC from a technical design question to a high‑stakes partisan red line in US housing and financial legislation.
- Increases the chance that any US CBDC authority is constrained or permanently blocked for the rest of the decade.
- Widens policy divergence versus jurisdictions pressing ahead with CBDCs like e‑CNY and the digital euro.
- Pushes US regulators even more toward private, GENIUS‑aligned stablecoins as the main digital dollar channel.
- Signals that CBDC opposition will remain a live political issue in future budget and authorization fights.
Powered by
